“The Spear”, the work
of art that drove a further wedge in our already divided country! That is
pretty much how I am experiencing this painting by Brett Murray. Is it art? Well art by definition is so
subjective one cannot argue that it isn't. So while the painting is not
aesthetically pleasing to me, it does make a bold statement. Whether you agree
with the statement the painting makes or not, is not what is relevant to me.
We have a great
constitution which protects freedom of speech, and one has to respect that. With
freedom comes responsibility, and I cannot appreciate one man's freedom when it
comes at the expense of another. Freedom by its nature exempts you from
external control or influence, so when you exercise yours, what are you doing
to another’s freedom? Take out Brett Murray, the white guy who is an artist.
Take out Jacob Zuma, the Black President who practices polygamy. These are two
people real people with emotions. Add the public that is now embroiled in this
spat, and the emotional roller coaster increases exponentially.
I am not sure what the intention of Murray’s painting was, but I am concerned that the outcome is not bothering him. He did not divide this country, but he is certainly not uniting it. There is a large proportion of the public, beyond the politicians and the President, who feel violated, and rightly so. Just because you do not understand Jacob Zuma's culture and values which come across in the way that he lives, does not mean that ridiculing those behaviors is OK!
Murray’s intent might have been to
tell a story from his point of view. I believe his intent was to act in the
best interest of the public in telling his story through the painting. The
outcome though, does not play out to his original intent, surely? This matter
going to court has lost the true meaning of the artist’s impression, unless if
Murray is getting exactly what he wanted? If his cry is the greed of
politicians post the apartheid era, and that is the story the painting was
looking to tell, then is he not playing to the same tune by insisting on his work
being made public? Is the greed for fame and power what is keeping him stuck on
his point of view too?
You cannot demand respect, so I don’t
think Zuma can appeal to Murray on those grounds. Respect is something that we
should all give, forget about earning it! Art is supposed to be there
to enrich society. Freedom to create is there to enrich society.
Having freedom requires delicate balance. It cannot work in isolation of looking at yourself only. It is in itself an art, not a science. The question is; how do we enrich our society while at the same time enriching ourselves? It's not a zero sum game, where one loses and the other wins. It's about what you do to make for a win/win result? You don’t need a court of law to get to that solution.
You can follow Thabo Hermanus on twitter, http://twitter.com/fit4thabo
No comments:
Post a Comment